Preview

Supportive Therapy in Oncology

Advanced search

The effect of the volume of infusion therapy on the first operating days after Lewis esophageal resection with gastric esophagoplasty (combined laparotomy and thoracotomy access on the right) on the course of the postoperative period and outcomes in cancer patients

https://doi.org/10.17650/3034-2473-2025-2-2-19-26

Abstract

Aim.  To study the effect of volume infusion on the first 24 hours after Lewis esophageal resection with gastric esophagoplasty (combined laparotomy and thoracotomy access on the right) on the immediate results and outcomes in cancer patients.

Materials and methods. The study retrospectively included patients who underwent Lewis resections of the esophagus with gastric esophagoplasty (combined laparotomy and thoracotomy access on the right) for malignant neoplasms of esophagus, as well as cardioesophageal cancer at the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology in 2023.

Results. Forty patients were included in the study. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the median rate of daily infusion therapy: in patients of group 1 (n = 21) on the 1st day of surgery, the intravenous infusion rate was ≥4 ml/kg/day, in patients of group 2 (n = 19) – <4 ml/kg/day. The complication rate was 47.7 % (n = 10) in group 1 and 84.2 % (n = 16) – in group 2 (p = 0.021). The incidence of complications ≥III grade according to Clavien–Dindo classification did not differ in both groups (p = 1.000). The incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis was 4.8 % (n = 1) in group 1 and 31.6 % (n = 6) in group 2 (p = 0.039). Ninety-day postoperative mortality was not observed in any of the groups. The length of hospital stay for patients in group 1 was 17 (15–18) days, in group 2 –16 (14–20) days (p = 0.707).

Conclusion. The results of the study revealed that the number of common complications and the frequency of postoperative deep vein thrombosis in patients of the group 2, who received a daily infusion volume of <4 ml/kg/day, was higher than in patients of the group 1. 

The data from this study should be taken into account when planning infusion therapy in patients with esophageal malignancies and cardioesophageal cancer during Lewis esophageal resections with gastric esophagoplasty (combined laparotomy and thoracotomy access on the right).

About the Authors

Alexander V. Sytov
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Alexander Viktorovich Sytov.

23, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522.



Olga S. Vlasenko
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

23, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522.



Ekaterina N. Nikolaeva
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

23, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522.



Pavel V. Kononets
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

23, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522.



Omar B. Abu-Haidar
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

23, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522.



Maksat A. Ibraev
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

23, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522.



References

1. Straatman J., van der Wielen N., Cuesta M.A. et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME trial. Ann Surg 2017;266(2):232–6. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002171

2. Boers J., Joldersma A., van Dalsen A.D. et al. Intensified neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 2020;27(5): 1520–8. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-08114-z

3. Raymond D.P., Seder C.W., Wright C.D. et al. Predictors of major morbidity or mortality after resection for esophageal cancer: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database Risk Adjustment Model. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;102(1):207–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.04.055

4. Veelo D.P., van Berge Henegouwen M.I., Ouwehand K.S. et al. Effect of goal-directed therapy on outcome after esophageal surgery: a quality improvement study. PLoS One 2017;12(3):e0172806. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172806

5. Grocott M.P., Dushianthan A., Hamilton M.A. et al. Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes after surgery: a Cochrane Systematic Review. Br J Anaesth 2013; 111(4):535–48. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet155

6. Navarro L.H., Bloomstone J.A., Auler J.O. Jr. et al. Perioperative fluid therapy: a statement from the international Fluid Optimization Group. Perioper Med (Lond) 2015;4:3. DOI: 10.1186/s13741-015-0014-z

7. Assaad S., Popescu W., Perrino A. Fluid management in thoracic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2013;26(1):31–9. DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32835c5cf5

8. Zhang J., Qiao H., He Z. et al. Intraoperative fluid management in open gastrointestinal surgery: goal-directed versus restrictive. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2012;67(10):1149–55. DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2012(10)06

9. Kendrick J.B., Kaye A.D., Tong Y. et al. Goal-directed fluid therapy in the perioperative setting. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2019;35(Suppl 1):S29–S34. DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_26_18

10. Bellamy M.C. Wet, dry or something else? Br J Anaesth 2006;97(6):755–7. DOI: 10.1093/bja/ael290

11. Sizov V.A., Raevskaya M.B., Kovalerova N.B. et al. Intraoperative fluid therapy during esophagectomy followed by repair. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova = Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery 2017;(11):37–43. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia20171137-43

12. Han S., Wu X., Li P. et al. The impact of goal-directed fluid therapy on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg 2024;19(1):60. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02519-y

13. Bray F., Laversanne M., Sung Y. et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2024;74(3):229–63. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21834

14. The state of cancer care for the population of Russia in 2022. Ed. by A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, A.O. Shakhzadova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Hertsena – filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2023. 239 p. (In Russ.).

15. Paireder M., Asari R., Radlspöck W. et al. Esophageal resection in Austria – preparing a national registry. Eur Surg 2021;53:206–14. DOI: 10.1007/s10353-021-00734-8

16. Parise P., Elmore U., Fumagalli U. et al. Esophageal surgery in Italy. Criteria to identify the hospital units and the tertiary referral centers entitled to perform it. Updates Surg 2016;68(2):129–33. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-016-0374-z

17. Pipanmekaporn T., Punjasawadwong Y., Charuluxananan S.S. et al. Association of positive fluid balance and cardiovascular complications after thoracotomy for noncancer lesions. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2014;7:121–9. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S64585

18. Dushianthan A., Knight M., Russell P., Grocott M.P. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDHT) in surgical patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of GDHT on post-operative pulmonary complications. Perioper Med (Lond) 2020;9:30. DOI: 10.1186/s13741-020-00161-5

19. Wei S., Tian J., Song X., Chen Y. Association of perioperative fluid balance and adverse surgical outcomes in esophageal cancer and esophagogastric junction cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86(1):266–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.03.017


Review

For citations:


Sytov A.V., Vlasenko O.S., Nikolaeva E.N., Kononets P.V., Abu-Haidar O.B., Ibraev M.A. The effect of the volume of infusion therapy on the first operating days after Lewis esophageal resection with gastric esophagoplasty (combined laparotomy and thoracotomy access on the right) on the course of the postoperative period and outcomes in cancer patients. Supportive Therapy in Oncology. 2025;2(2):19-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/3034-2473-2025-2-2-19-26

Views: 28


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 3034-2473 (Print)
ISSN 3034-3178 (Online)